Hand Timed vs Laser 40: How Much Faster Is a Stopwatch?
Updated · Fact checked
A coach with a stopwatch and a pair of laser gates can watch the same run and write down two different 40 times. In the studies that tested this on football players, the stopwatch was usually faster, by roughly two to three tenths of a second.
That gap is bigger than the difference between a lot of positions' combine averages, so it matters which kind of time you have. Here is what the research measured, why the gap is not one fixed number, and how to compare a hand time fairly.
40-yard dash: the published numbers
NFL Combine, 2000 to 2018, by position (average ± standard deviation)
| Position | 40-yard dash |
|---|---|
| Quarterback | 4.82 ± 0.19 s |
| Running back | 4.54 ± 0.10 s |
| Wide receiver | 4.50 ± 0.10 s |
| Tight end | 4.75 ± 0.15 s |
| Offensive line | 5.24 ± 0.17 s |
| Defensive tackle | 5.08 ± 0.15 s |
| Defensive end / edge rusher | 4.81 ± 0.14 s |
| Linebacker | 4.69 ± 0.12 s |
| Cornerback | 4.48 ± 0.09 s |
| Safety | 4.54 ± 0.09 s |
Frank DJ, King MJ, Dennard CD, Macnamara BN. Discriminant Function Analysis Reveals Which Combination of Measures from the NFL Scouting Combine Predict NFL Performance. Journal of Expertise 2023;6(2):130-163, Table 4. The study's analysed samples were 117 to 462 players per position; it does not say whether these averages use that sample or every participant.
High school combine players, all positions: 40-yard dash 5.3 ± 0.4 sGillen ZM, Shoemaker ME, McKay BD, Cramer JT. State Population Influences Athletic Performance Combine Test Scores in High School-Aged American Football Players. Int J Exerc Sci 2019;12(6):256-262, Table 1 (raw values). Pooled across the paper's three groups.
440's 40 targets by plan
| Plan | High school | College | Pro reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterback | 5.13 s | 4.93 s | 4.85 s |
| Running Back | 4.83 s | 4.63 s | 4.55 s |
| Wide Receiver | 4.78 s | 4.58 s | 4.50 s |
| Tight End | 5.00 s | 4.80 s | 4.72 s |
| Offensive Line | 5.58 s | 5.38 s | 5.30 s |
| Defensive Line | 5.23 s | 5.03 s | 4.95 s |
| Linebacker | 4.98 s | 4.78 s | 4.70 s |
| Defensive Back | 4.78 s | 4.58 s | 4.50 s |
| Kicker | 5.23 s | 5.03 s | 4.95 s |
| Punter | 5.23 s | 5.03 s | 4.95 s |
| Athlete | 4.88 s | 4.68 s | 4.60 s |
440 Football's own targets: a pro reference per position, plus 0.28 s for high school and 0.08 s for college.
Rank your 40-yard dash in the free calculatorWhat the timing studies found
The study 440's calculator relies on timed 59 Division II college players with an electronic system and, on the same runs, with seven experienced hand timers. The electronic clock started when the player lifted their hand from a switch mat and stopped when their torso broke an infrared beam; the hand timers started on the player's first movement from a three-point stance. Hand times averaged 4.85 seconds and electronic times 5.16, a gap of 0.31 seconds.
A 2015 study of 81 Division I players found a smaller gap: 0.22 seconds for experienced timers and 0.26 for novices, compared with a touch pad start and an infrared beam finish. Experience did not make the stopwatch match the electronic time.
Surface moved the number too. With 24 college players, the hand-minus-electronic gap was 0.28 seconds on field turf and 0.22 on natural grass, while the electronic 40 times themselves barely changed between surfaces.
Why there is no exact conversion
Hand times are not always faster. In a 2007 study of physically active college men and women, where photoelectric gates started and stopped the clock, the electronic time did not differ significantly from one hand timer, and the other two hand timers were slower. The authors concluded hand timing may not always produce faster times.
A 2008 study, in which newly trained stopwatch timers clocked 25-meter splits of trained runners' 200-meter sprints, found the errors spread too widely to build a reliable correction factor. Its advice was to report stopwatch times without trying to correct them and to read them with their limits in mind.
Electronic systems differ from each other as well. A 2012 study compared start methods over 40 meters: a hand-release pod start was 0.17 seconds faster than a block start reacting to a gun, and a standing start that tripped a photocell was 0.27 faster. The authors put it down to whether the trigger includes reaction time, plus momentum and body position at the moment the clock starts. So two electronic times only compare cleanly when the clock is started the same way.
Comparing your time fairly
Know which kind of time you are looking at. The high school averages on these pages come from combines where every sprint was timed with Zybek laser gates. How the NFL Combine starts and stops its clock is covered in the 40-yard dash guide.
The 40-yard dash calculator has a hand-timed box. Tick it and the calculator adds 0.31 seconds, the average gap from the 59-player study, before it ranks your time. Treat the result as a rough estimate: other studies found smaller gaps, and the 2008 study found no reliable way to correct a stopwatch time.
For tracking your own progress, the method matters more than the clock. Use the same timing, the same timer, the same start and the same surface every time. A hand time from your coach is still useful for watching yourself improve; it just is not the same number as a laser time at a high school combine. See your position guide for 440's 40 target on your plan.
FAQ
How much faster is a hand-timed 40?
In studies of college football players timed both ways on the same runs, stopwatch 40s averaged 0.22 to 0.31 seconds faster than electronic times, depending on the study, the timers and the surface. In a study of college students where gates started the clock, the averaged hand time was slower, not faster.
How do I convert a hand time to a laser time?
There is no exact conversion. Adding about 0.3 seconds matches the 59-player study's average gap, which is what 440's calculator does, but a 2008 study found stopwatch errors too variable for a reliable correction.
Are all laser times the same?
No. How the clock starts matters. A 2012 study found different start methods changed 40-meter times by 0.17 seconds or more, because some triggers include reaction time and others start the clock after the runner is already moving.
Does field turf make you faster than grass?
Not in the 40, in one study of 24 college players: electronic times were 5.34 seconds on field turf and 5.33 on grass. Their hand-timed pro agility times were faster on turf.
Build my position plan
Pick your position, level and schedule. Get a daily position plan with loads, timers and demo videos, adjusted for your equipment, training phase and readiness.
Build my position planSources
- Comparison between hand and electronic timing of 40-yd dash performance in college football players (Mayhew et al., J Strength Cond Res 2010;24(2):447-51; abstract via NCBI E-utilities), PubMed / Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Validity and reliability of hand and electronic timing for 40-yd sprint in college football players (Mann, Ivey, Brechue, Mayhew; J Strength Cond Res 2015;29(6):1509-14; abstract via NCBI E-utilities), PubMed / Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Comparison of speed and agility performance of college football players on field turf and natural grass (Gains et al., J Strength Cond Res 2010;24(10):2613-7; abstract via NCBI E-utilities), PubMed / Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Effect of competitiveness on forty-yard dash performance in college men and women (Moore et al., J Strength Cond Res 2007;21(2):385-8; abstract via NCBI E-utilities), PubMed / Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- Reliability and accuracy of handheld stopwatches compared with electronic timing in measuring sprint performance (Hetzler et al., J Strength Cond Res 2008;22(6):1969-76; abstract via NCBI E-utilities), PubMed / Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- The difference is in the start: impact of timing and start procedure on sprint running performance (Haugen, Tønnessen, Seiler; J Strength Cond Res 2012;26(2):473-9; abstract via NCBI E-utilities), PubMed / Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
- State Population Influences Athletic Performance Combine Test Scores in High School-Aged American Football Players (Gillen, Shoemaker, McKay, Cramer; Int J Exerc Sci 2019;12(6):256-262), PMC / International Journal of Exercise Science
Program numbers (benchmarks, sets, reps, loads, protein targets) are 440 Football's own prescriptions. For athletes 13 and older; check with a physician or a registered dietitian before major training or diet changes.